--- 1/draft-ietf-rtcweb-video-01.txt	2014-10-27 15:14:45.007869439 -0700
+++ 2/draft-ietf-rtcweb-video-02.txt	2014-10-27 15:14:45.027869915 -0700
@@ -1,18 +1,18 @@
 
 Network Working Group                                         A.B. Roach
 Internet-Draft                                                   Mozilla
 Intended status: Standards Track                        October 27, 2014
 Expires: April 30, 2015
 
              WebRTC Video Processing and Codec Requirements
-                       draft-ietf-rtcweb-video-01
+                       draft-ietf-rtcweb-video-02
 
 Abstract
 
    This specification provides the requirements and considerations for
    WebRTC applications to send and receive video across a network.  It
    specifies the video processing that is required, as well as video
    codecs and their parameters.
 
 Status of This Memo
 
@@ -196,27 +196,27 @@
    Encoders are encouraged to support encoding media with at least the
    same resolution and frame rates cited above.
 
 5.1.  VP8
 
    If VP8, defined in [RFC6386], is supported, then the endpoint MUST
    support the payload formats defined in [I-D.ietf-payload-vp8].  In
    addition it MUST support the 'bilinear' and 'none' reconstruction
    filters.
 
-   In addition to the [RFC6236] mechanism, H.264 encoders MUST limit the
-   streams they send to conform to the values indicated by receivers in
-   the corresponding max-fr and max-fs SDP attributes.
-
    TODO: There have been claims that VP8 already requires supporting
    both filters; if true, these do not need to be reiterated here.
 
+   In addition to the [RFC6236] mechanism, VP8 encoders MUST limit the
+   streams they send to conform to the values indicated by receivers in
+   the corresponding max-fr and max-fs SDP attributes.
+
 5.2.  H.264
 
    If [H264] is supported, then the device MUST support the payload
    formats defined in [RFC6184].  In addition, they MUST support
    Constrained Baseline Profile Level 1.2, and they SHOULD support H.264
    Constrained High Profile Level 1.3.
 
    Implementations of the H.264 codec have utilized a wide variety of
    optional parameters.  To improve interoperability the following
    parameter settings are specified: