--- 1/draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-02.txt 2014-11-22 08:14:58.220832850 -0800 +++ 2/draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-03.txt 2014-11-22 08:14:58.260833837 -0800 @@ -1,24 +1,24 @@ Internet Engineering Task Force N. Akiya Internet-Draft G. Swallow Updates: 4379,6424 (if approved) Cisco Systems Intended status: Standards Track S. Litkowski -Expires: April 25, 2015 B. Decraene +Expires: May 26, 2015 B. Decraene Orange J. Drake Juniper Networks - October 22, 2014 + November 22, 2014 Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping/Trace Multipath Support for Link Aggregation Group (LAG) Interfaces - draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-02 + draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-03 Abstract This document defines an extension to the Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping and Traceroute to describe Multipath Information for Link Aggregation (LAG) member links separately, thus allowing MPLS LSP Ping and Traceroute to discover and exercise specific paths of layer 2 (L2) Equal-Cost Multipath (ECMP) over LAG interfaces. @@ -38,21 +38,21 @@ Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." - This Internet-Draft will expire on April 25, 2015. + This Internet-Draft will expire on May 26, 2015. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents @@ -477,27 +477,30 @@ 6. DDMAP TLV DS Flags: G One flag, G, is added in DS Flags field of the DDMAP TLV. In the MPLS echo request message, G flag MUST be cleared when sending, and ignored on receipt. In the MPLS echo reply message, G flag MUST be set if the DDMAP TLV describes a LAG interface. It MUST be cleared otherwise. DS Flags - DS Flags G is added, in Bit Number 3, in DS Flags bit vector. + DS Flags G is added, in Bit Number TBD4, in DS Flags bit vector. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | MBZ |G|MBZ|I|N| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ + RFC-Editor-Note: Please update above figure to place the flag G in + the bit number TBD4. + Flag Name and Meaning ---- ---------------- G LAG Description Indicator When this flag is set, DDMAP describes a LAG interface. 7. Interface Index Sub-TLV The Interface Index object is a Sub-TLV that MAY be included in a @@ -746,27 +748,25 @@ TBD3 Detailed Interface and Label Stack TLV this document 10.4. DS Flags The IANA is requested to assign a new bit number from the "DS flags" sub-registry from the "Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Paths (LSPs) Ping Parameters - TLVs" registry ([IANA-MPLS-LSP-PING]). Note: the "DS flags" sub-registry is created by - [I-D.decraene-mpls-lsp-ping-registry]. + [I-D.ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registry]. Bit number Name Reference ---------- ---------------------------------------- --------- - TBD4(3) G: LAG Description Indicator this document - - This document requests the bit number 3 as TBD4. + TBD4 G: LAG Description Indicator this document 10.5. New Sub-Registry 10.5.1. Sub-TLVs for TLV Type TBD3 The IANA is requested to make a new "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type TBD3" sub- registry under "Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture (MPLS) Label Switched Paths (LSPs) Ping Parameters - TLVs" registry. Initial values for this sub-registry, "Sub-TLVs for TLV Types TBD3", @@ -782,43 +782,43 @@ 11. Acknowledgements Authors would like to thank Nagendra Kumar and Sam Aldrin for providing useful comments and suggestions. 12. References 12.1. Normative References + [I-D.ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registry] + Decraene, B., Akiya, N., Pignataro, C., Andersson, L., and + S. Aldrin, "IANA registries for LSP ping Code Points", + draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registry-00 (work in progress), + November 2014. + [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC4379] Kompella, K. and G. Swallow, "Detecting Multi-Protocol Label Switched (MPLS) Data Plane Failures", RFC 4379, February 2006. [RFC6424] Bahadur, N., Kompella, K., and G. Swallow, "Mechanism for Performing Label Switched Path Ping (LSP Ping) over MPLS Tunnels", RFC 6424, November 2011. 12.2. Informative References - [I-D.decraene-mpls-lsp-ping-registry] - Decraene, B., Akiya, N., Pignataro, C., Andersson, L., and - S. Aldrin, "IANA registries for LSP ping Code Points", - draft-decraene-mpls-lsp-ping-registry-00 (work in - progress), October 2014. - [I-D.ietf-mpls-ipv6-only-gap] George, W. and C. Pignataro, "Gap Analysis for Operating - IPv6-only MPLS Networks", draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-only-gap-02 - (work in progress), August 2014. + IPv6-only MPLS Networks", draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-only-gap-03 + (work in progress), October 2014. [IANA-MPLS-LSP-PING] IANA, "Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Paths (LSPs) Ping Parameters", . [IEEE802.1AX] IEEE Std. 802.1AX, "IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks - Link Aggregation", November