Network Working Group P. Koch Internet-Draft DENIC eG Intended status:Best Current July 9, 2007 PracticeBCP L. Vegoda Expires:January 10, 2008December 16, 2010 ICANN June 14, 2010 Moving MCAST.NET into the ARPA infrastructure top level domaindraft-ietf-mboned-mcast-arpa-01draft-ietf-mboned-mcast-arpa-02 Abstract This document proposes to migrate the MCAST.NET domain into the ARPA top level domain that is dedicated to infrastructure support. It also provides for a maintenance policy for the new MCAST.ARPA domain and covers migration issues and caveats. This document updates RFC 5771 and forms part of BCP 51. XXX reverse mapping Status of this MemoBy submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or sheThis Internet-Draft isaware have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes aware will be disclosed,submitted inaccordancefull conformance withSection 6the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force(IETF), its areas, and its working groups.(IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts.Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.This Internet-Draft will expire onJanuary 10, 2008.December 16, 2010. Copyright Notice Copyright(C) The(c) 2010 IETF Trust(2007). Abstractand the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This documentproposesis subject tomigrate the MCAST.NET domain intoBCP 78 and theARPA top level domain that is dedicatedIETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating toinfrastructure support. It also provides for a maintenance policyIETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights andcovers migration issuesrestrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions andcaveats.are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. This documentupdatesmay contain material from IETF Documents or IETF Contributions published or made publicly available before November 10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process. Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format it for publication as an RFC3171.or to translate it into languages other than English. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31.1.2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. The ARPA top level domain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32.4. Current Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33.5. Registration Policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33.1.5.1. Names and Addresses eligible for Registration in MCAST.ARPA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 3.2.4 5.2. Subdomains of MCAST.ARPA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43.3. Corresponding5.3. Corresponding Reverse Mapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5.3.1. Reverse Mapping for 224/4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5.3.2. Reverse Mapping for FF0::/12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44.6. Migration Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44.1.6.1. Migration Strategies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 4.1.1.5 6.1.1. Freeze . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 4.1.2.5 6.1.2. Phase Out . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54.1.3.6.1.3. Continue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55.7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56.8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 7.6 9. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 8.6 10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 8.1.6 10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 8.2.6 10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .67 Appendix A. Document Revision History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .67 A.1. Changes from-00 to-01 to -02 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .67 A.2.Initial DocumentChanges from -00 to -01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 A.3. Initial Document . . .7 Author's Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements. . . . 8 1. Introduction This document describes a maintenance policy and migration strategy for the MCAST.NET (MCAST.ARPA) domain that contains names for a subset of the multicast groups assigned by the IANA.Comments should be sent2. Terminology The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are tothe mboned working group. 1.1.be interpreted as described in BCP 14, [RFC2119]. 3. The ARPA top level domain [RFC3172] designates the ARPA top level domain as "Address and Routing Parameters Area" to be used for infrastructure applications. The MCAST.NET second level domain fulfills the criterialayedset out in section 2.1 of [RFC3172]. However, there is no standards track document explicitly designating this domain to a multicast group name to multicast group address mapping.[RFC3171][RFC5771] defines the IPv4 multicast address assignment policy. [RFC4291] defines the IPv6 multicast address assignment policy.2.4. Current Use Currently the zone MCAST.NET reflects the contents of parts the IANA IPv4 multicast address registry. However, some names are missing from the DNS zone and some names used differ from the description that appears in the registry file. Entries in the IPv6 multicast address registry are not reflected in the MCAST.NET zone. With few exceptions, only multicast group addresses from 224.0.0/24 and 224.0.1/24 are listed in MCAST.NET. Addresses outside 224/8 do not appear at all.3.5. Registration Policy Names within MCAST.ARPA will consist of one additional label andwillMUST adhere to the hostname syntax requirements of [RFC1123]. These nameswillMUST own a single A RR, a single AAAA RR, or both. Addresses will be in the IPv4 or IPv6 multicast address space.3.1.5.1. Names and Addresses eligible for Registration in MCAST.ARPA Only IANA multicast address registrations are eligible for being listed in MCAST.ARPA. For IPv4, only multicast groups from 224.0.0/24 (Local Network Control Block) and 224.0.1/24 (Internetwork Control Block) will have names assigned.3.2.For IPv6, only multicast groups from FF01::/16 (Node-Local Scope Multicast Addresses) and FF02::/16 (Link-Local Scope Multicast Addresses) will have names assigned. 5.2. Subdomains of MCAST.ARPA The namespace under MCAST.ARPA is considered flat, i.e., all direct descendants of MCAST.ARPA are leaves in the DNS tree. Future extensions might want to define subdomains that serve special purposes. Any such designation needs IETF consensus[RFC2434]. 3.3.[RFC5226]. 5.3. Corresponding Reverse Mapping The DNS Reverse Mapping for those multicast groups that appear as addresses in MCAST.ARPAis toMUST be kept consistent with the forward namespace. 5.3.1. Reverse Mapping for 224/4 A single DNS PTR record will be entered at the corresponding owner within the 224.IN-ADDR.ARPA domain that points to the multicast group namenamewithin MCAST.ARPA. The zones 225.IN-ADDR.ARPA through 239.IN-ADDR.ARPA will be delegated butshallMUST remain empty (except necessary infrastructure RRs). The one exception is 233.IN-ADDR.ARPA. A mechanism for the delegation of reverse mapping for GLOP space [RFC3180] should be designed and implemented. 5.3.2. Reverse Mapping for FF0::/12 [How to deal with IPv6 multicast reverse mapping is TBD.]4.6. Migration Issues The current content of the MCAST.NET zoneshallMUST be brought in line with the multicast address registry. Since legacy systems may use MCAST.NET for quite some time, there needs to be a mapping/forwarding solution to answer those queries in a useful manner without discouraging migration. RFCs mentioning MCAST.NET are [RFC3261] and [RFC3678]. An updated multicast addressassignment policyarchitecture appears in [I-D.ietf-mboned-addrarch].4.1.6.1. Migration Strategies After the move, several options are available for the future handling of MCAST.NET.4.1.1.[[The working group needs to choose one of the options.]] 6.1.1. Freeze The current MCAST.NET zone could be frozen, so that no additions, deletions or changes to the content (apart from those necessary for maintenance, e.g. SOA and NS RRs) would beperfomed.performed. New registrations would only be available in MCAST.ARPA, so this could be an incentive for querying clients to alter their behavior as well.4.1.2.6.1.2. Phase Out MCAST.NET would only see deletions.4.1.3.Even after the last record will have been deleted, the domain should be kept registered by the IANA to prevent redelegation ... 6.1.3. Continue MCAST.NET could be further operated in parallel, either by operational habit or per DNAMERR. 5.RR, as described in [RFC2672]. 7. Security Considerations The usual Security Considerations for the DNSapply.[RFC3833]apply. The MCAST.ARPA., MCAST.NET., and the Reverse mapping zones mentioned in this document SHALL be DNSSEC signed by the IANA under direction from the IAB. There is no Security Problem associated with the migration itself.MCAST.ARPA. should be signed with DNSSEC as soon as the ARPA zone is signed.XXX keeping MCAST.NET. {This section needs more work.}6.8. IANA Considerations This document amends[RFC3171][RFC5771] to add a mandatory entry in the MCAST.ARPA domain and a corresponding reverse mapping entry. The officially registered multicast group name is made subject to DNS hostname syntax rules.7.9. Acknowledgements Theauthorauthors would like to thank David Conrad and Joe Abley forhistheir input.8.10. References8.1.10.1. Normative References [RFC1034] Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - concepts and facilities", STD 13, RFC 1034, November 1987. [RFC1035] Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - implementation and specification", STD 13, RFC 1035, November 1987. [RFC1123] Braden, R., "Requirements for Internet Hosts - Application andSupport", STD 3,Support", STD 3, RFC 1123, October 1989. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC3172] Huston, G., "Management Guidelines & Operational Requirements for the Address and Routing Parameter Area Domain ("arpa")", BCP 52, RFC 3172, September 2001. [RFC3180] Meyer, D. and P. Lothberg, "GLOP Addressing in 233/8", BCP 53, RFC 3180, September 2001. [RFC4291] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture", RFC1123, October 1989. [RFC2434]4291, February 2006. [RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC2434, October 1998. [RFC3171] Albanna, Z., Almeroth, K., Meyer, D.,5226, May 2008. [RFC5771] Cotton, M., Vegoda, L., andM. Schipper,D. Meyer, "IANA Guidelines for IPv4 Multicast Address Assignments", BCP 51, RFC3171, August 2001. [RFC3172] Huston, G., "Management Guidelines & Operational Requirements for the Address and Routing Parameter Area Domain ("arpa")", BCP 52, RFC 3172, September 2001. 8.2.5771, March 2010. 10.2. Informative References [I-D.ietf-mboned-addrarch] Savola, P., "Overview of the Internet Multicast Addressing Architecture",draft-ietf-mboned-addrarch-05draft-ietf-mboned-addrarch-06 (work in progress),October 2006. [RFC2780] Bradner, S. and V. Paxson, "IANA Allocation Guidelines For Values In the Internet Protocol and Related Headers", BCP 37,August 2009. [RFC2672] Crawford, M., "Non-Terminal DNS Name Redirection", RFC2780, March 2000.2672, August 1999. [RFC2908] Thaler, D., Handley, M., and D. Estrin, "The Internet Multicast Address Allocation Architecture", RFC 2908, September 2000. [RFC3261] Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston, A., Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M., and E. Schooler, "SIP: Session Initiation Protocol", RFC 3261, June 2002. [RFC3678] Thaler, D., Fenner, B., and B. Quinn, "Socket Interface Extensions for Multicast Source Filters", RFC 3678, January 2004. [RFC3833] Atkins, D. and R. Austein, "Threat Analysis of the Domain Name System (DNS)", RFC 3833, August 2004. Appendix A. Document Revision History This section is to be removed should the draft be published. A.1. Changes from -01 to -02 Added text about v6 multicast. Added text about GLOP space Added terminology section and RFC 2119 language A.2. Changes from -00 to -01 Added text about DNS reverse mapping. Eligibility for an MCAST.ARPA name now restricted to 224.0.0/24 and 224.0.1/24. Stronger requirement for MCAST.ARPA subdomains.A.2.A.3. Initial Document First draft, taking over with only little changes from draft-koch-mboned-mcast-arpa-00.txtAuthor's AddressAuthors' Addresses Peter Koch DENIC eGWiesenhuettenplatz 26Kaiserstrasse 75-77 Frankfurt 60329 DE Phone: +49 69 27235 0 Email: pk@DENIC.DEFull Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007). This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights. This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Intellectual Property The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79. Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permissionLeo Vegoda Internet Corporation forthe use of such proprietary rights by implementers or usersAssigned Names and Numbers 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330 Marina del Rey 90292 United States ofthis specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr. The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org. Acknowledgment Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA).America Phone: +1-310-823-9358 Email: leo.vegoda@icann.org URI: http://www.iana.org/