draft-ietf-manet-dsr-08.txt		draft-ietf-manet-dsr-09.txt
	IETF MANET Working Group David B. Johnson, Rice University		IETF MANET Working Group David B. Johnson, Rice University
	INTERNET-DRAFT David A. Maltz, Carnegie Mellon University		INTERNET-DRAFT David A. Maltz, Carnegie Mellon University
	24 February 2003 Yih-Chun Hu, Rice University		15 April 2003 Yih-Chun Hu, Rice University
	The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol		The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol
	for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (DSR)		for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (DSR)
	<draft-ietf-manet-dsr-08.txt>		<draft-ietf-manet-dsr-09.txt>
	Status of This Memo		Status of This Memo
	This document is an Internet-Draft and is subject to all provisions		This document is an Internet-Draft and is subject to all provisions
	of Section 10 of RFC 2026.		of Section 10 of RFC 2026.
	Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering		Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
	Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note		Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note
	that other groups may also distribute working documents as		that other groups may also distribute working documents as
	Internet-Drafts.		Internet-Drafts.
	skipping to change at page 43, line 25		skipping to change at page 43, line 25
	+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+		+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
	| Error Destination Address |		| Error Destination Address |
	+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+		+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
	. .		. .
	. Type-Specific Information .		. Type-Specific Information .
	. .		. .
	+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+		+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
	Option Type		Option Type
	2. Nodes not understanding this option will ignore this		3. Nodes not understanding this option will ignore this
	option.		option.
	Opt Data Len		Opt Data Len
	8-bit unsigned integer. Length of the option, in octets,		8-bit unsigned integer. Length of the option, in octets,
	excluding the Option Type and Opt Data Len fields.		excluding the Option Type and Opt Data Len fields.
	For the current definition of the Route Error option,		For the current definition of the Route Error option,
	this field MUST be set to 10, plus the size of any		this field MUST be set to 10, plus the size of any
	Type-Specific Information present in the Route Error. Further		Type-Specific Information present in the Route Error. Further
	skipping to change at page 100, line 24		skipping to change at page 100, line 24
	of Link-MaxLife above. The specific variable names are used for		of Link-MaxLife above. The specific variable names are used for
	demonstration purposes only, and an implementation is not required		demonstration purposes only, and an implementation is not required
	to use these names for these configuration variables. For each		to use these names for these configuration variables. For each
	configuration variable below, the default value is specified to		configuration variable below, the default value is specified to
	simplify configuration. In particular, the default values given		simplify configuration. In particular, the default values given
	below are chosen for a DSR network where nodes move at relative		below are chosen for a DSR network where nodes move at relative
	velocities between 12 and 25 seconds per transmission radius.		velocities between 12 and 25 seconds per transmission radius.
	InitStability 25 seconds		InitStability 25 seconds
	StabilityIncrFactor 4		StabilityIncrFactor 4
	StabilityDecrFactor 2		StabilityDecrFactor 1/2
	MinLifetime 1 second		MinLifetime 1 second
	UseExtends 120 seconds		UseExtends 120 seconds
	Appendix B. Location of DSR in the ISO Network Reference Model		Appendix B. Location of DSR in the ISO Network Reference Model
	When designing DSR, we had to determine at what layer within		When designing DSR, we had to determine at what layer within
	the protocol hierarchy to implement ad hoc network routing. We		the protocol hierarchy to implement ad hoc network routing. We
	considered two different options: routing at the link layer (ISO		considered two different options: routing at the link layer (ISO
	layer 2) and routing at the network layer (ISO layer 3). Originally,		layer 2) and routing at the network layer (ISO layer 3). Originally,
End of changes.
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.23, available from http://www.levkowetz.com/ietf/tools/rfcdiff/