draft-ietf-manet-dlep-da-credit-extension-07.txt		draft-ietf-manet-dlep-da-credit-extension-08.txt
	Network Working Group B. Cheng		Network Working Group B. Cheng
	Internet-Draft D. Wiggins		Internet-Draft D. Wiggins
	Intended status: Standards Track MIT Lincoln Laboratory		Intended status: Standards Track MIT Lincoln Laboratory
	Expires: September 7, 2019 L. Berger		Expires: May 22, 2020 L. Berger
	LabN Consulting, L.L.C.		LabN Consulting, L.L.C.
	March 6, 2019		November 19, 2019
	DLEP DiffServ Aware Credit Window Extension		DLEP DiffServ Aware Credit Window Extension
	draft-ietf-manet-dlep-da-credit-extension-07		draft-ietf-manet-dlep-da-credit-extension-08
	Abstract		Abstract
	This document defines an extension to the DLEP protocol that enables		This document defines an extension to the Dynamic Link Exchange
	a DiffServ aware credit-window scheme for destination-specific and		Protocol (DLEP) that enables a DiffServ aware credit-window scheme
	shared flow control.		for destination-specific and shared flow control.
	Status of This Memo		Status of This Memo
	This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the		This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
	provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.		provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
	Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering		Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
	Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute		Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
	working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-		working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
	Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.		Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
	Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months		Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
	and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any		and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
	time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference		time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
	material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."		material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
	This Internet-Draft will expire on September 7, 2019.		This Internet-Draft will expire on May 22, 2020.
	Copyright Notice		Copyright Notice
	Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the		Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
	document authors. All rights reserved.		document authors. All rights reserved.
	This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal		This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
	Provisions Relating to IETF Documents		Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
	(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of		(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
	publication of this document. Please review these documents		publication of this document. Please review these documents
	skipping to change at page 4, line 25 ¶		skipping to change at page 4, line 25 ¶
	capabilities SHOULD be reported to the user via normal network		capabilities SHOULD be reported to the user via normal network
	management mechanisms, e.g., user interface or error logging.		management mechanisms, e.g., user interface or error logging.
	4. Security Considerations		4. Security Considerations
	This document defines a DLEP extension that uses base DLEP mechanisms		This document defines a DLEP extension that uses base DLEP mechanisms
	and the credit window control and flow mechanisms defined in		and the credit window control and flow mechanisms defined in
	[I-D.ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification] and		[I-D.ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification] and
	[I-D.ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control]. The use of those		[I-D.ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control]. The use of those
	mechanisms, and the introduction of a new extension, do not		mechanisms, and the introduction of a new extension, do not
	inherently introduce any additional threats above those documented in		inherently introduce any additional vulnerabilities above those
	[RFC8175]. The approach taken to Security in that document applies		documented in [RFC8175]. The approach taken to Security in that
	equally to the mechanism defined in this document.		document applies equally to the mechanism defined in this document.
	5. IANA Considerations		5. IANA Considerations
	This document requests one assignment by IANA. All assignments are		This document requests one assignment by IANA. All assignments are
	to registries defined by [RFC8175].		to registries defined by [RFC8175].
	5.1. Extension Type Value		5.1. Extension Type Value
	This document requests 1 new assignment to the DLEP Extensions		This document requests 1 new assignment to the DLEP Extensions
	Registry named "Extension Type Values" in the range with the		Registry named "Extension Type Values" in the range with the
	skipping to change at page 5, line 9 ¶		skipping to change at page 5, line 9 ¶
	+------+------------------------------+		+------+------------------------------+
	Table 1: Requested Extension Type Value		Table 1: Requested Extension Type Value
	6. References		6. References
	6.1. Normative References		6.1. Normative References
	[I-D.ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control]		[I-D.ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control]
	Cheng, B., Wiggins, D., Berger, L., and S. Ratliff, "DLEP		Cheng, B., Wiggins, D., Berger, L., and S. Ratliff, "DLEP
	Credit-Based Flow Control Messages and Data Items", draft-		Credit-Based Flow Control Messages and Data Items", draft-
	ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control-03 (work in progress),		ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control-04 (work in progress),
	August 2018.		March 2019.
	[I-D.ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification]		[I-D.ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification]
	Cheng, B., Wiggins, D., and L. Berger, "DLEP Traffic		Cheng, B., Wiggins, D., and L. Berger, "DLEP Traffic
	Classification Data Item", August 2018.		Classification Data Item", August 2018.
	[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate		[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
	Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,		Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
	DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,		DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
	<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.		<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
	skipping to change at page 5, line 35 ¶		skipping to change at page 5, line 35 ¶
	[RFC8175] Ratliff, S., Jury, S., Satterwhite, D., Taylor, R., and B.		[RFC8175] Ratliff, S., Jury, S., Satterwhite, D., Taylor, R., and B.
	Berry, "Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP)", RFC 8175,		Berry, "Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP)", RFC 8175,
	DOI 10.17487/RFC8175, June 2017,		DOI 10.17487/RFC8175, June 2017,
	<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8175>.		<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8175>.
	6.2. Informative References		6.2. Informative References
	[I-D.berger-manet-dlep-ether-credit-extension]		[I-D.berger-manet-dlep-ether-credit-extension]
	Wiggins, D. and L. Berger, "DLEP IEEE 802.1Q Aware Credit		Wiggins, D. and L. Berger, "DLEP IEEE 802.1Q Aware Credit
	Window Extension", draft-berger-manet-dlep-ether-credit-		Window Extension", draft-berger-manet-dlep-ether-credit-
	extension-01 (work in progress), August 2018.		extension-02 (work in progress), March 2019.
	[RFC2475] Blake, S., Black, D., Carlson, M., Davies, E., Wang, Z.,		[RFC2475] Blake, S., Black, D., Carlson, M., Davies, E., Wang, Z.,
	and W. Weiss, "An Architecture for Differentiated		and W. Weiss, "An Architecture for Differentiated
	Services", RFC 2475, DOI 10.17487/RFC2475, December 1998,		Services", RFC 2475, DOI 10.17487/RFC2475, December 1998,
	<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2475>.		<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2475>.
	Appendix A. Acknowledgments		Appendix A. Acknowledgments
	The sub data item format was inspired by Rick Taylor's "Data Item		The sub data item format was inspired by Rick Taylor's "Data Item
	Containers". He also proposed the separation of credit windows from		Containers". He also proposed the separation of credit windows from
End of changes. 8 change blocks.
	13 lines changed or deleted		13 lines changed or added
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.47. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/