--- 1/draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-17.txt 2020-07-29 01:13:10.365977139 -0700 +++ 2/draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-18.txt 2020-07-29 01:13:10.453979359 -0700 @@ -1,19 +1,19 @@ IPWAVE Working Group J. Jeong, Ed. Internet-Draft Sungkyunkwan University -Intended status: Informational July 28, 2020 -Expires: January 29, 2021 +Intended status: Informational July 29, 2020 +Expires: January 30, 2021 IPv6 Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (IPWAVE): Problem Statement and Use Cases - draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-17 + draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-18 Abstract This document discusses the problem statement and use cases of IPv6-based vehicular networking for Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). The main scenarios of vehicular communications are vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V), vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I), and vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communications. First, this document explains use cases using V2V, V2I, and V2X networking. Next, for IPv6-based vehicular networks, it makes a gap analysis of current @@ -30,21 +30,21 @@ Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." - This Internet-Draft will expire on January 29, 2021. + This Internet-Draft will expire on January 30, 2021. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents @@ -66,24 +66,25 @@ 4.1. Vehicular Network Architecture . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 4.2. V2I-based Internetworking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 4.3. V2V-based Internetworking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 5. Problem Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 5.1. Neighbor Discovery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 5.1.1. Link Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 5.1.2. MAC Address Pseudonym . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 5.1.3. Routing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 5.2. Mobility Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 - 7. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 - Appendix A. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 - Appendix B. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 - Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 + 7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 + 8. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 + Appendix A. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 + Appendix B. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 + Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 1. Introduction Vehicular networking studies have mainly focused on improving safety and efficiency, and also enabling entertainment in vehicular networks. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the US allocated wireless channels for Dedicated Short-Range Communications (DSRC) [DSRC] in the Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) with the frequency band of 5.850 - 5.925 GHz (i.e., 5.9 GHz band). DSRC- based wireless communications can support vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V), @@ -1363,35 +1364,38 @@ virtual bogus vehicles, and register them with IP-RSUs and MA. This registration makes the IP-RSUs and MA waste their resources. The IP- RSUs and MA need to determine whether a vehicle is genuine or bogus in mobility management. Also, the confidentiality of control packets and data packets among IP-RSUs and MA, the E2E paths (e.g., tunnels) need to be protected by secure communication channels. In addition, to prevent bogus IP-RSUs and MA from interfering with the IPv6 mobility of vehicles, mutual authentication among them needs to be performed by certificates (e.g., TLS certificate). -7. Informative References +7. IANA Considerations + + This document does not require any IANA actions. + +8. Informative References [Automotive-Sensing] Choi, J., Va, V., Gonzalez-Prelcic, N., Daniels, R., R. Bhat, C., and R. W. Heath, "Millimeter-Wave Vehicular Communication to Support Massive Automotive Sensing", IEEE Communications Magazine, December 2016. [Bitcoin] Nakamoto, S., "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System", URL: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf, May 2009. [CA-Cruise-Control] California Partners for Advanced Transportation Technology - (PATH), "Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control", [Online] - Available: + (PATH), "Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control", Available: http://www.path.berkeley.edu/research/automated-and- connected-vehicles/cooperative-adaptive-cruise-control, 2017. [CASD] Shen, Y., Jeong, J., Oh, T., and S. Son, "CASD: A Framework of Context-Awareness Safety Driving in Vehicular Networks", International Workshop on Device Centric Cloud (DC2), March 2016. [CBDN] Kim, J., Kim, S., Jeong, J., Kim, H., Park, J., and T. @@ -1414,22 +1418,21 @@ [EU-2008-671-EC] European Union, "Commission Decision of 5 August 2008 on the Harmonised Use of Radio Spectrum in the 5875 - 5905 MHz Frequency Band for Safety-related Applications of Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS)", EU 2008/671/EC, August 2008. [FirstNet] U.S. National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), "First Responder Network Authority - (FirstNet)", [Online] - Available: https://www.firstnet.gov/, 2012. + (FirstNet)", Available: https://www.firstnet.gov/, 2012. [FirstNet-Report] First Responder Network Authority, "FY 2017: ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS, Advancing Public Safety Broadband Communications", FirstNet FY 2017, December 2017. [Fuel-Efficient] van de Hoef, S., H. Johansson, K., and D. V. Dimarogonas, "Fuel-Efficient En Route Formation of Truck Platoons", IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, @@ -1475,31 +1478,27 @@ Networking - Amendment 1", ISO 21210:2012/AMD 1:2017, September 2017. [NHTSA-ACAS-Report] National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), "Final Report of Automotive Collision Avoidance Systems (ACAS) Program", DOT HS 809 080, August 2000. [OMNI] Templin, F. and A. Whyman, "Transmission of IPv6 Packets over Overlay Multilink Network (OMNI) Interfaces", draft- - templin-6man-omni-interface-24 (work in progress), June + templin-6man-omni-interface-27 (work in progress), June 2020. [RFC2710] Deering, S., Fenner, W., and B. Haberman, "Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD) for IPv6", RFC 2710, October 1999. - [RFC3561] Perkins, C., Belding-Royer, E., and S. Das, "Ad hoc On- - Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing", RFC 3561, July - 2003. - [RFC3753] Manner, J. and M. Kojo, "Mobility Related Terminology", RFC 3753, June 2004. [RFC3810] Vida, R. and L. Costa, "Multicast Listener Discovery Version 2 (MLDv2) for IPv6", RFC 3810, June 2004. [RFC3849] Huston, G., Lord, A., and P. Smith, "IPv6 Address Prefix Reserved for Documentation", RFC 3849, July 2004. [RFC4086] Eastlake 3rd, D., Schiller, J., and S. Crocker, @@ -1572,24 +1571,20 @@ [RFC6830BIS] Farinacci, D., Fuller, V., Meyer, D., Lewis, D., and A. Cabellos, "The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP)", draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-32 (work in progress), March 2020. [RFC7149] Boucadair, M. and C. Jacquenet, "Software-Defined Networking: A Perspective from within a Service Provider Environment", RFC 7149, March 2014. - [RFC7181] Clausen, T., Dearlove, C., Jacquet, P., and U. Herberg, - "The Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2", - RFC 7181, April 2014. - [RFC7296] Kaufman, C., Hoffman, P., Nir, Y., Eronen, P., and T. Kivinen, "Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2)", RFC 7296, October 2014. [RFC7333] Chan, H., Liu, D., Seite, P., Yokota, H., and J. Korhonen, "Requirements for Distributed Mobility Management", RFC 7333, August 2014. [RFC7429] Liu, D., Zuniga, JC., Seite, P., Chan, H., and CJ. Bernardos, "Distributed Mobility Management: Current @@ -1634,21 +1629,21 @@ Koukoumidis, E., Peh, L., and M. Martonosi, "SignalGuru: Leveraging Mobile Phones for Collaborative Traffic Signal Schedule Advisory", ACM MobiSys, June 2011. [TR-22.886-3GPP] 3GPP, "Study on Enhancement of 3GPP Support for 5G V2X Services", 3GPP TR 22.886/Version 16.2.0, December 2018. [Truck-Platooning] California Partners for Advanced Transportation Technology - (PATH), "Automated Truck Platooning", [Online] Available: + (PATH), "Automated Truck Platooning", Available: http://www.path.berkeley.edu/research/automated-and- connected-vehicles/truck-platooning, 2017. [TS-23.285-3GPP] 3GPP, "Architecture Enhancements for V2X Services", 3GPP TS 23.285/Version 16.2.0, December 2019. [TS-23.287-3GPP] 3GPP, "Architecture Enhancements for 5G System (5GS) to Support Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) Services", 3GPP