--- 1/draft-ietf-extra-specialuse-important-02.txt 2018-04-30 23:13:10.120892298 -0700 +++ 2/draft-ietf-extra-specialuse-important-03.txt 2018-04-30 23:13:10.144892868 -0700 @@ -1,18 +1,18 @@ Network Working Group B. Leiba, Ed. Internet-Draft Huawei Technologies -Intended status: Standards Track April 19, 2018 -Expires: October 19, 2018 +Intended status: Standards Track May 01, 2018 +Expires: October 31, 2018 IMAP $Important Keyword and \Important Special-Use Attribute - draft-ietf-extra-specialuse-important-02 + draft-ietf-extra-specialuse-important-03 Abstract RFC 6154 created an IMAP Special-Use LIST extension and defined an initial set of attributes. This document defines a new attribute, "\Important", and establishes a new IANA registry for IMAP folder attributes, registering the attributes defined in RFCs 3348, 3501, and 6154. This document also defines a new IMAP keyword, "$Important", and registers it in the registry defined in RFC 5788. @@ -24,21 +24,21 @@ Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." - This Internet-Draft will expire on October 19, 2018. + This Internet-Draft will expire on October 31, 2018. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/ license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights @@ -229,21 +229,23 @@ strategic starting point. If the algorithm by which messages are determined to be important is well known, still more information is exposed -- perhaps, for example, there is an implication that the senders of these messages are particularly significant to the mailbox owner, and perhaps that is information that should not be made public. As noted in RFC 6154, it is wise to protect the IMAP channel from passive eavesdropping, and to defend against unauthorized discernment of the identity of a user's "\Important" mailbox or of a user's - "$Important" messages. + "$Important" messages. See [RFC3501], Section 11, for security + considerations about using the IMAP STARTTLS command to protect the + IMAP channel. 6. IANA Considerations This document contains 3 actions for IANA, specified in the sections below: 1. Registration of the "$Important" keyword. 2. Creation of a new "IMAP Mailbox Name Attributes" registry. @@ -353,37 +356,45 @@ | Name | | | +===============+===================================+===========+ | All | All messages | [RFC6154] | +---------------+-----------------------------------+-----------+ | Archive | Archived messages | [RFC6154] | +---------------+-----------------------------------+-----------+ | Drafts | Messages that are working drafts | [RFC6154] | +---------------+-----------------------------------+-----------+ | Flagged | Messages with the \Flagged flag | [RFC6154] | +---------------+-----------------------------------+-----------+ - | HasChildren | Has accessible child mailboxes | [RFC3348] | * + | HasChildren | Has accessible child mailboxes | [RFC5258] | * +---------------+-----------------------------------+-----------+ - | HasNoChildren | Has no accessible child mailboxes | [RFC3348] | * + | HasNoChildren | Has no accessible child mailboxes | [RFC5258] | * +---------------+-----------------------------------+-----------+ | Important | Messages deemed important to user | THIS RFC | +---------------+-----------------------------------+-----------+ | Junk | Messages identified as Spam/Junk | [RFC6154] | +---------------+-----------------------------------+-----------+ | Marked | Server has marked the mailbox as | [RFC3501] | * | | "interesting" | | +---------------+-----------------------------------+-----------+ | NoInferiors | No hierarchy under this name | [RFC3501] | * +---------------+-----------------------------------+-----------+ + | NonExistent | The mailbox name doesn't actually | [RFC5258] | * + | | exist | | + +---------------+-----------------------------------+-----------+ | Noselect | The mailbox is not selectable | [RFC3501] | * +---------------+-----------------------------------+-----------+ + | Remote | The mailbox exists on a remote | [RFC5258] | * + | | server | | + +---------------+-----------------------------------+-----------+ | Sent | Sent mail | [RFC6154] | +---------------+-----------------------------------+-----------+ + | Subscribed | The mailbox is subscribed to | [RFC5258] | + +---------------+-----------------------------------+-----------+ | Trash | Messages the user has discarded | [RFC6154] | +---------------+-----------------------------------+-----------+ | Unmarked | No new messages since last select | [RFC3501] | * +===============+===================================+===========+ The rows marked with "*" at the end should have their Usage Notes field set to "not used by JMAP". 7. Changes During Document Development