--- 1/draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-07.txt 2021-09-08 09:13:11.963384354 -0700 +++ 2/draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-08.txt 2021-09-08 09:13:11.983384858 -0700 @@ -1,19 +1,19 @@ CBOR Working Group M. Richardson Internet-Draft Sandelman Software Works Intended status: Standards Track C. Bormann -Expires: 2 February 2022 Universität Bremen TZI - 1 August 2021 +Expires: 12 March 2022 Universität Bremen TZI + 8 September 2021 CBOR tags for IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and prefixes - draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-07 + draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-08 Abstract This specification defines two CBOR Tags to be used with IPv6 and IPv4 addresses and prefixes. // RFC-EDITOR-please-remove: This work is tracked at // https://github.com/cbor-wg/cbor-network-address Status of This Memo @@ -24,21 +24,21 @@ Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." - This Internet-Draft will expire on 2 February 2022. + This Internet-Draft will expire on 12 March 2022. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2021 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/ license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights @@ -58,24 +58,25 @@ 3.1.3. Interface Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3.2. IPv6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3.3. IPv4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4. Encoder Considerations for Prefixes . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 5. Decoder Considerations for Prefixes . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 6. CDDL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 8.1. Tag 54 - IPv6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 8.2. Tag 52 - IPv4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 + 8.3. Tags 260 and 261 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 - Appendix A. Changelog . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 + Appendix A. Changelog . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 1. Introduction [RFC8949] defines a number of CBOR Tags for common items. Tags 260 and 261 were later defined through IANA [IANA.cbor-tags]. These tags cover addresses (260), and prefixes (261). Tag 260 distinguishes between IPv6, IPv4 and Ethernet through the length of the byte string only. Tag 261 was not documented well enough to be used. @@ -316,20 +317,25 @@ 8.1. Tag 54 - IPv6 Data Item: byte string or array Semantics: IPv6, [prefixlen,IPv6], [IPv6,prefixpart] 8.2. Tag 52 - IPv4 Data Item: byte string or array Semantics: IPv4, [prefixlen,IPv4], [IPv4,prefixpart] +8.3. Tags 260 and 261 + + IANA is requested to add the note "DEPRECATED in favor of 52 and 54" + to registrations 260 and 261" + 9. References 9.1. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, . [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC